The Cruises Go Knuts for Knut

61. Oh get real, the Tom and Katie space cadets use their own kid to get publicity, they are the biggest users of that kid around. Using a kid with those cheesy family PR outings just to promote Tom's latest bomb is the biggest put-down of all. When Tom doesn't want to be seen, he isn't seen, it is that simple. But when he wants to be seen as the perfect family man for promoting a movie, out comes his phoney family outings and that is the REALLY disgusting put-down of Suri, using her like that. And Tom's movie is going to bomb anyway.

Posted at 10:14PM on Aug 13th 2007 by laffin

62. Why don't you tell Tom and Katie to lay off their own kid, every time Tom needs publicity, he hauls out the shake n' bake family for one of his forced marches with a cast of hundreds. Suri is drug out by Tom all the time JUST for publicity, and I think that is THE worst of all put-downs.

Posted at 10:18PM on Aug 13th 2007 by Jock

63. hey miapocca, YOU'RE A LOSER :) SOOOOOO jealous! You actually sound quite obsessed with Tomkat, too bad u don't know what you're yappin' about!

Mind your own biznass and channel that anger...who are you to judge anyone's religion or parenting? At least scientologists don't drink and drug, and sleep around...

and all the rest of you haters...your kid(s) should be as lucky as Suri..she has parents who love her and the best of everything...the paps are an occupational hazard...we all WANT to see Suri! No way her parents are exploiting her.

Posted at 11:26PM on Aug 13th 2007 by kelly is a betch

64. The only Knut there is Tom.

Posted at 2:26AM on Aug 14th 2007 by Shannon

65. i love that she won't stay still. so adorable. :)

Posted at 5:13AM on Aug 14th 2007 by lynn

66. Hey, "Kelly is a Betch (bitch)." What do you mean, "Scientologists don't sleep around"?
Your Mr. Tom Cat cheated on his wife, Mimi Rogers, with Nicole Kidman while making a movie with her and later married her. Then he cheated on Nicole with Penelope Cruz and ended up leaving Nicole for Penelope. Then he went out and shopped the cradle until he found a taker, Katie Holmes. HA-HA-HA, what a loser. Now it looks like he is abandoning his other kids and is using his cute kid to get publicity for his stink bomb movie.
Yeah, you really have a good role model, here. Tell us another good one. Not buying it.

Posted at 5:54AM on Aug 14th 2007 by waitaminute

67. Suri ...lucky, have you read anythign about how scientologist bring up theri kids...you should only feel sorry for her....gogle bitch, google...and oh are htey keeping the manuals away from you till you cross the bridge of clear..ahahhahahhahah

Disgusting specimens of human weaklings...some join scientology ot be elightened, others to meet movie stars and get famous..I guess you are in teh later of if I could only get soooo close ot teh stars in sceintolowierdology I will make it....I guess now i undestand your projection of claiming people are jealous of some freaks....Aask Kaite holmes if all her shopping sprees or rather the ones midget put an end to were making her happy....trying to find fulfillment by buying shoes, wont make anyone foolish hag happy...ahhahahahha

Posted at 6:23PM on Aug 14th 2007 by Miapocca

68.
hey ..check this out…exposed ..the bbc attack in bringing out secrets they just shot themselves in the foot…

______

I see some of my former friends from the Church using their time-honored persecution technique claiming that everyone is out to get them and the church.

Those who are wondering if there is an active effort to post comments and spread links favorable to the church, why of course there is. As an ex-member, I used to be involved in just such activity. It’s not as if members are sitting in a room typing comments all day long at some church somewhere. Instead, action alerts are sent out in e-mail and on private websites with links to suspect websites and articles like this one, and members are encouraged to visit and file Knowledge Reports detailing the negative comments, including any identifying information about who made them, and also attaching their responses. This information is then stored in electronic databases for future reference and tracking purposes.

It is also incorrect to say that new members are not exposed to tech straight away upon entry into the organization. From the earliest moments of involvement in the church, tech is taught. I’ve included a link which shows exactly what early members are exposed to which will be absolutely familiar to anyone, right down to OT-0.

I left the Church in 2001 after I was pressured to disconnect my family. A close friend of mine who left a year earlier was deemed an SP (the church’s blacklist) and his life was made a living hell. I quit when I started doing research on the Internet and started getting answers to questions I had been putting in the back of my mind. The Lisa McPherson Trust helped me tremendously.

The media and the Internet are incredibly dangerous for the Church because they let members privately explore their own doubts and questions outside of the control of the Church. An incredible amount of time and money is spent on restricting this information because it threatens the viability of the entire organization, should enough people follow my footsteps.

I don’t blame my friends still in the Church for their beliefs. You don’t know just how effective group persuasion and tech methods can be. For those outside of the Church, the cause for skepticism is as plain as day, but for those within, attacking them for their beliefs threatens their self-worth, and people will try to defend that for a long time.

Sc!entol0gy attacks psychiatry, which is ironic, because so many of their techniques of manipulation were tested and found effective by that same field!

But for critics of the church, please don’t attack Sc!entologist followers for their beliefs — help show them there is a way out to a world that waits to welcome them back with open and accepting arms. That is what ultimately worked for me and I could not be happier. You cannot lead someone away from Sc!entology through name-calling.

Posted by: Ex-Member | May 17, 2007 01:21 PM

Posted at 8:32AM on Aug 14th 2007 by Miapocca

69. Wonder where the real baby daddy, Josh Hartnett was?

Posted at 8:33AM on Aug 14th 2007 by KK

70.

Miapocca
See Cruise get a derserved whipping form the German press:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,353577,00.html

Matt Lauer should have asked deeper questions but I guess he was jsut too shocked by whitnessing the lunacy of the midget

Posted at 9:35PM on Aug 18th 2007 by Miapocca

71. Personally, I found TMZ ABSOLUTELY AND TOTALLY MEAN in their frigging comments! and that includes all those frigging jealous mean writers as well .

If you have NOTHING nice to say (as it is the daily case with TMZ and 99% of the comments writers), then you should ALL SHUT THE HELL UP!!

Posted at 11:32AM on Aug 14th 2007 by Blues Woman

72.
If they really wanted a nice family day at the zoo, I'm sure they could have found a way to get there without all the photographers. This is purely a PR move . They didnt even stop to look at the animals. The shame of it is they have a beautiful little girl that will never have a normal life. Hopefully they will come to their senses and stop using poor Suri to enhance their images in Hollywood.

Posted at 2:01PM on Aug 14th 2007 by jojo

73. I agree with post #14. Where are his other two children. They are not with Nicole. She is in Australia making a movie but there is no mention they are there with her. When Katie was preggers that is all you ever saw was the two of them at their kids ballgames. Now there is never a mention of them. I read they live with him the majority of the time and only visit their mom when she is in tow. So, where are they? Wouldn't they like to go to the zoo, too? Katie looks like she needs help holding Suri. Also, hoo-ray for Suri. She has jeans on. First time I've been pictures in normal clothes. Usually, it is those long, scientology /amish looking dressess.

Posted at 1:30PM on Aug 14th 2007 by CUBS FAN

74. KELLY, do you even read what you write? It's pretty idiotic for you to go on and on about freedom of this and freedom of that and then bash Mia for stating an opinion, dumba s s!! The rest of your post isn't even worth commenting on it's so ridiculous!!!
Tom cruise doesn't kiss and tell........and makes sure no one else does either!!! everyone he comes in contact with has to sign confidentiality agreements!!!!
HA!!!

Posted at 1:41PM on Aug 14th 2007 by libraesque

75. oh, why do i keep posting in here...
Mia and libra--u r typical star-obsessed forum bullies who always fall back on "freedom of speech" rights to justify your uninformed and myopic hate-spewed BS.

My point is, what has Tomkat done to you that u feel compelled to talk all this smack about him/his family? NADA. The truth is he has done more for this world than you both could ever hope to...there's a reason he is still on good terms with his exes, can u say the same? (my guess is NO)...Here's an idea; leave him, his wife and children alone, go after people who deserve to be bashed.

that's it, my work is done here :)

Posted at 3:26PM on Aug 14th 2007 by kelly is a betch